Trains.com

26 Settle Suit in Texas Veterans Parade Crash That Killed 4

1865 views
8 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Monday, January 19, 2015 11:37 AM
I agree.  If I am not mistaken, the driver of the float was not charged with a traffic violation.  How can you explain that but for the fact that there was great sympathy for the veterans and their cause? I don’t think U.P. wanted to be seen as being on the wrong side of that, no matter what it cost them. 
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Monday, January 19, 2015 11:22 AM

The UP, like all the big seven, has a policy of going all out to help vets.  By settling out of court, they do not injure the public relations aspects of that policy.  That there were four veterans made this a very special case for them.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Monday, January 19, 2015 10:44 AM
Oh yeah American way...drunk driver crashes into a masonry building, survives, and sues not only the building's owner, but the tenants, the builder, and even the masonry manufacturer. Blame everything but the actual cause.

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 1,180 posts
Posted by ROBERT WILLISON on Monday, January 19, 2015 10:05 AM

You said it Leo, the american way.

  • Member since
    October 2003
  • 7,968 posts
Posted by K. P. Harrier on Sunday, January 18, 2015 10:26 PM

The “court-ordered mediation” concerns me, and might explain why UP settled.  Oh, the glories of coercion!

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- K.P.’s absolute “theorem” from early, early childhood that he has seen over and over and over again: Those that CAUSE a problem in the first place will act the most violently if questioned or exposed.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,022 posts
Posted by tree68 on Friday, January 16, 2015 6:06 PM

I'd opine that they were one of several deep pockets that were sued, particularly in view of the plaintiff's assertion that there was not enough warning.

In a case like this, folks sue pretty much everybody who is even remotely associated.  I wouldn't be surprised to find that the manufacturer of the crossing signal equipment somehow got dragged into it, among others.

That UP settled is more an indication that it was going to be cheaper to settle than that the railroad had any culpability.  That's often the case.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 1,881 posts
Posted by Leo_Ames on Friday, January 16, 2015 5:54 PM

That's the American way. 

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Duluth,Minnesota,USA
  • 4,015 posts
Posted by coborn35 on Friday, January 16, 2015 5:46 PM

I am confused as to why Union Pacific had to pay anything? Why was there a lawsuit against them? Clearly they were not at fault.

Mechanical Department  "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."

The Missabe Road: Safety First

 

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • 2,325 posts
26 Settle Suit in Texas Veterans Parade Crash That Killed 4
Posted by rdamon on Friday, January 16, 2015 3:36 PM

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/attorney-26-settle-suit-texas-parade-crash-killed-28277143

Twenty-six people who were hurt or had family members killed when a freight train struck a veterans parade float in Midland two years ago have settled their lawsuit against Union Pacific Railroad, both sides said Friday.

Lawyer Kevin Glasheen, who represents the families, said the settlement is confidential but they "are very satisfied." The families of two of the four veterans killed in the November 2012 crash were part of the agreement. Many others were injured.

"It's sufficient to give them security and comfort in their lives," Glasheen said of the settlement amount.

. . . . .

An investigation by the National Transportation Safety Board blamed the accident on city and parade organizers, faulting a lack of safety planning by both. The plaintiffs claimed a short warning from the train crossing lights and gates was the principal cause.

. . . . .

 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy