Trains.com

DPU's.

448 views
4 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, August 29, 2004 12:16 PM
Don't like them at all.
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Sunday, August 29, 2004 11:57 AM
I think it's a good idea to provide the necessary equipment and modifications to allow locomotives to work as DPUs, whether or not there is extensive current use of DPUs on trains. Imho, the ability to control engine speed and excitation 'finely', rather than having to rely on typical MU selections, is a potential source of fuel savings and lower wear on engine and running-gear components. It's also potentially easy to implement effective PTS and PTC on freight trains if you have DPU capabilities on leading as well as in-train power...

I could mention that DPU is a Big Foot In The Door for single-man crews and, eventually, remote mainline operation, but why reopen that can of worms now? ;-P
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, August 29, 2004 11:16 AM
It has its places like long unit coal trains. But as for general freights, I think that its a waste of horsepower for a loco that only needs to be used part of the time
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: roundhouse
  • 2,747 posts
Posted by Randy Stahl on Sunday, August 29, 2004 9:12 AM
See overcoming technical problems for runaway trains.
Randy
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
DPU's.
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, August 29, 2004 8:20 AM
Do you "like" or "do not" like the DPU?
[bow]BNSF[bow]

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy