Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Why hasn't Bimodal Technology taken off in Class 1 intermodal service???
Edit topic
Updated your discussion topic below.
Subject
Enter a subject for your topic. Maximum 150 characters.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
The news of CN discontinuing their Montreal to Chicago Roadrailer service has been very very disconcerting to me. Again after an important Class 1 expansion give it a year or two, RETRENCHMENT ANBANDONMENT!! <br /> <br />As a New Yorker I saw Roadrailer, Railrunner and their ilke make the promise of breaking into the 97% truck dominated NYC market with equipment that meshes well with heavy commuter and intercity passenger traffic that dominmates our local rails. In the early '80s I watched the Empire State Xpress in a short time become the the dominant carrier in the NYC to Buffalo traffic lane. With 50 unit consists rocketing up and down the Hudson Div. at 70+ MPH speeds with only ONE U36B hauling it and sometimes only one B23-7. (It was way faster than the single unit FL9 hauled Amtrak Lake Shore Limited New York Section.)Only to see it quicky die partly due to no backhaul out of NYC. <br /> <br />Here some other example of broken promises: <br /> <br />The possible Florida to Hunterspoint (Bronx) service. Still a pipe dream . <br /> <br />The joint NS(Triple Crown)/Amtrak service to Sunnyside yards and on to Hicksville, Long Island. Third rail interferrence and Amtrak is getting out of the Roadrailer business. <br /> <br />Even Triple Crown has RETRENCHED from the NYC market. Terminating in Bethlehem, PA instead of Elizabethport NJ. <br /> <br />My question is what is wrong with the present Class 1 management mentality and market circumstances with the glorious exception of Triple Crown, that does not allow bimodal technology to be used and used effectively ???? <br /> <br />It can't be the terminal cost and motive power requirements. What Class 1 intermodal train can accelerate like a subway train and maintain passenger train speeds generally with one modern high horsepower locomotive or whose terminal requirements is generally a patch of blacktop and a heavy duty forklift?? <br /> <br />Again My question is what is wrong with the present Class 1 management mentality and market circumstances with the glorious exception of Triple Crown, that does not allow bimodal technology to be used and used effectively ???? <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
E-mail Subscribe
Check the box below if you want to receive e-mail notifications when replies are made to this thread.
Receive notifications
Update Discussion Topic
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy