Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Sometimes the railroad is at fault
Edit topic
Updated your discussion topic below.
Subject
Enter a subject for your topic. Maximum 150 characters.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Thought y'all might find this of interest. My guess is that 99.99 per cent of crossing accidents happen to be Darwin's theory in action- the dumber the driver, the more fatal the accident. However, it looks like NS fouled up on maintenance of way in this case.... <br /> <br /> <br /> Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2004 7:23 am Post subject: Railroad Liable For Failing To Maintain Vegetation At Crossi <br /> <br />-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> <br />Railroad Liable For Failing To Maintain Vegetation At Crossing <br />The estate of a driver killed at a railway crossing could sue the railroad <br />under state law for failing to maintain vegetation that obscured the driver's <br />ability to see the oncoming train, the 6th Circuit has ruled, upholding a $1.4 million jury award. <br />http://www.lawyersweeklyusa.com/pdf/usa/04/shanklin9928412.pdf to read the full text of the opinion. <br /> <br />Erik
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
E-mail Subscribe
Check the box below if you want to receive e-mail notifications when replies are made to this thread.
Receive notifications
Update Discussion Topic
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy