Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Brighton Park Junction
Edit topic
Updated your discussion topic below.
Subject
Enter a subject for your topic. Maximum 150 characters.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
I have a question. Why is this busy crossing STILL such an anachronism and NOT a modern interlocked plant? <br /> <br />Because railroading is first and foremost a business, I suspect the answer is money. My guess is the Pennsy [which controlled the junction] had no motivation to upgrade the signaling and control system at Brighton Park because it's Panhandle line was a secondary line and the major beneficiaries would be Pennsy competitors B&O and NYC. PennCentral certainly had no money for an upgrade. Are my guesses and suspicions correct? <br /> <br />But why didn't Conrail and now NS upgrade Brighton Park into an interlocked plant? <br />
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
E-mail Subscribe
Check the box below if you want to receive e-mail notifications when replies are made to this thread.
Receive notifications
Update Discussion Topic
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy