Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
crew alerters and safety standards better in Canada
Edit topic
Updated your discussion topic below.
Subject
Enter a subject for your topic. Maximum 150 characters.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Regarding the UP Carizozo NM head on: <br /> <br />"The event recorders from both locomotives of the striking (eastbound) train recorded a speed of 36 mph at impact, with no input from the crew for several miles before the collision, including no braking action before impact." <br /> <br />Is a US model event recorder not tied to a crew alerter ? This collision would never have happened in Canada. The Reset Safety Device, or TMACS, used on BCRail, CN, and CP would have long stopped the train given that there were no control inputs from the deceased hogger for several miles. <br /> <br />Not that I am taking pot shots, but our SBU's have always been two -way, and the BNSF runaway in Cajon Pass where the hogger was unable to dump his train from the tail end would have never occurred with Canadian equipment either. <br /> <br />Adrian <br />BCR conductor <br />Ft ST John BC
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
E-mail Subscribe
Check the box below if you want to receive e-mail notifications when replies are made to this thread.
Receive notifications
Update Discussion Topic
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy