Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
"Railroads can't maintain pace of coal demand"
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote user="greyhounds"] <p>[quote user="spokyone"]Does FM have a point about BNSF pursuing trackage rights over the DM&E<span class="smiley">[?]</span>[/quote]</p><p>No. Mat Rose is not anybody's fool (as FM foolishly claimed). And building a rail line as "standby" capcity is a waste of money.</p><p>Potential brief service interuptions can be more efficiently handled by stockpilling coal. Safety stock coal will offer more protection than a second rail line. For example, it will also protect against a mine shut down, something that also happens. A "standby" rail line will be useless in such a situation.</p><p>[/quote]</p><p>Does anyone know where Ken got this idea that new capacity in the PRB would be "standby"?</p><p>And yes, Matt Rose is an ABSOLUTE fool to not take advantage of the inevitable DM&E PRB extension by aiding the financing of the new line in some way in return for <em>additional</em> (not "standby") capacity.</p><p>And while we're at it, will someone please inform Ken that the current Orin line is shared capacity, so including DM&E in the shared capacity concept is a win-win for all three parties, not to mention the nation's coal consumers.</p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy