Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
There is still something missing here. There has to be more to the story of the second incident. If the form B was in effect until 1600 and the incident occurred at 1615, then the form B was not in effect. If the foreman had removed the red flags then there were no flags displayed. Why does everybody think the dispatcher did something wrong? There was no form B in effect at the time and there was no red flag displayed for her to tell the crew to go past. If everything that Ed has said has happened exactly that way then she owns the railroad again. She can line signals to her hearts content. She can run whatever trains she wants into the bridge area because the form B has expired. Its over, its finished. The foreman doesn't "give it back". If he wants to retain it he leaves the boards out and its handled as an undocumented red flags or he has to get track and time. There is something else going on with the second incident. From what I've read it wasn't a form B incident. Basically at 1615 there wasn't a form B in effect to violate. There have been little snippets of stuff about track and time but no details. That T&T may be the problem. Smith
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag