Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Locomotive "Edsels"
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote user="Murphy Siding"]<p> 1435mm: I agree on what you say about Edsel verses lemon. Perhaps a better desription would have been to use the name "Pacer".[:P]</p> <p> What locomotives would you consider to have been "lemons" (Or Pacers)? </p> <p> Can you elaborate on the idea of "too big"? Thanks</p> <p> </p>[/quote]<br><br>Too big = more horsepower (and price!) then is justified by the work it does. Tractive effort is limited by maximum permissible weight and maximum attainable adhesion and thus is not a meaningful improvement over a AC4400CW or SD70MAC. The extra 1600 horsepower would be meaningful at higher speeds but at a cost that made sense. It might have helped had the availability and MTBF been better, but even if GE and EMD had been able to match the performance of the AC4400CW and SD70MAC the economics still aren't there.<br><br>S. Hadid<br>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy