Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
DM&E Financing revisited.
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote user="Poppa_Zit"] <p><font face="Georgia">Now there's a can of worms that is better left unopened, at least in this venue. But you are right in saying "was given credit for being a neutral party" because that was the general perception, based on the company's (previously) sterling reputation.</font></p> [/quote]<br> <br> <br> When it comes to complicitness, there are many shades of gray.<br> <br> I doubt that AA intended from square one, to ultimately end up compromising it's integrity to the extent it did. The size of client that Enron was, and AA's hopes of keeping the client happy, probably played a role in an evolved form of complicitness.<br> <br> I do think there is a valid parallel, if for no other reason than to establish that we are in an era of monumental collapses that ultimately left somone holding the bag. Due caution does not seem at all foolish to me, in the spirit of "an ounce of prevention"<br> <br> <br> <br>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy