Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
double-stack vs piggyback
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<P>[quote user="riprap"]So, FM, are you arguing that it was a mistake to deregulate the RR's? Given some of your other musings on these threads, I wouldn't think so, but would re-regulating the RR's be of a piece with the "open access" I think you're calling for?[/quote]</P> <P>No, I'm arguing that regulation would have been less likely if railroads back in the day's before regulation had internally addressed the intramodal competitive issues - whether that be separate entities operating infrastructure and transporter operations, or having the railroads simply allow each other access over each other's lines to serve key terminals and gateways, or perhaps something else.</P> <P>But they didn't, and the result was regulation.</P> <P>As for today, I would favor strong anti-trust action rather than some form of pre-Staggers regulation. Allow DM&E and KCS full access over both UP and BNSF out west where true intramodal competition is lacking, do the same back East to some extent.</P> <P>Or do the AT&T style breakup of infrastructure from transporter operations.</P> <P>Just do whatever it takes to get some true intramodal competition going.</P>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy