Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
double-stack vs piggyback
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote user="n012944"] <P>[quote user="MichaelSol"]<FONT face=Arial size=3><BR>If you review the ARC [</FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>"</FONT><FONT face=Arial size=3>The Alliance for Rail Competition, whose members ship a wide variety of bulk, packaged and intermodal freight by rail"] </FONT><FONT face=Arial size=2><FONT size=3>and CURE websites, representing the major captive shipper industries, that's about all they talk about. If you review relevant Senate and House committee testimony over the past five years, you will see literally thousands of pages of testimony on the point. </FONT></FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000000 size=3><BR></FONT>[/quote]</P> <P> </P> <P>[(-D][(-D] Yea right, I will go read that right now[:D] However, FM, I guess I was wrong, other people are as off base as you. Sorry for not realizing that.</P> <P>Bert</P> <P>[/quote]</P> <P>Yep, the entire US manufacturing sector and their proponents are all off base, and only the railroad industry and their supporters are right. Par for the course embodied by this forum.</P>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy