Trains.com

southern railway "geeps"

1367 views
14 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Ridgeville,South Carolina
  • 1,294 posts
southern railway "geeps"
Posted by willy6 on Tuesday, November 25, 2003 1:23 PM
i was reading a book on the SOUTHERN RAILWAY,of which i'm modeling. the book states that southern railway was required by the union of that era to run the "geeps" long nose forward. why? i would think visability would better on the short end.
Being old is when you didn't loose it, it's that you just can't remember where you put it.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: K.C.,MO.
  • 1,063 posts
Posted by rrandb on Tuesday, November 25, 2003 1:37 PM
i believe it was a hold over from the steam era. they wanted the engine in front of the operating crew in case of a collision. it would allow more protection for the crew at grade crossings etc. they still had a fireman to look down one side and the engineer to look down the other. i beleive several roads originally operated there early diesels this way.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, November 25, 2003 1:53 PM
That's similar to what I heard about the NS operations too - that the NS preferred to run
long-hood forward for reasons of safety and I know the N&W had a similar policy.
I recall as a kid when I saw N&W trains on the old Clover Leaf/NKP trackage in Indiana seeing N&W trains operating long-hood forward and hearing that it was a safety practice.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Defiance Ohio
  • 13,319 posts
Posted by JoeKoh on Tuesday, November 25, 2003 4:53 PM
Yes I remember that too when we lived in Celina oh all the n&w trains would run long hood forward on the old NKP line.
stay safe
Joe

Deshler Ohio-crossroads of the B&O Matt eats your fries.YUM! Clinton st viaduct undefeated against too tall trucks!!!(voted to be called the "Clinton St. can opener").

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, November 25, 2003 5:39 PM
Southern, N&W, NYC and B&O, among others, were long front. I used to run the B&O's geeps, and I liked the long nose...extra padding. But I don't know that it was a "union requirement". I never heard that about B&O; it was just a matter of choice to the individual road, I think
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Wednesday, November 26, 2003 6:44 AM
N&W routinely ran long hood forward. An SD45 running in that fashion is a most interesting sight. Many of N&W's locomotives were also equipped with dual controls.
Shortly after William Moore left the Southern to become the head of Penn Central during its bankruptcy, an order of U23B's was delivered with single controls to run long hood forward but with low short hoods.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Wednesday, November 26, 2003 8:49 AM
The safety issue is also why NW had most of their diesels built with high short hoods when most others in the US were being delivered with low short hoods for better visibility. For example, I believe NW was the only road with high short hoods on the SD45 units. Jim
Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Louisville,Ky.
  • 5,077 posts
Posted by locomutt on Wednesday, November 26, 2003 10:09 AM
Okay, maybe I didn't catch it,but how come
both Southern and N&W opted for high short
hood on the diesels[?]
I understood the running long hood first,
but never under stood the other[:O]

Okay, maybe Jim said it on the previous post,
they just did. Anybody know Tom Dressler[?]
Maybe he could shed a little extra light on this
subject[:)]

locomutt[:D]

Being Crazy,keeps you from going "INSANE" !! "The light at the end of the tunnel,has been turned off due to budget cuts" NOT AFRAID A Vet., and PROUD OF IT!!

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Wednesday, November 26, 2003 12:49 PM
Believe the high short hood was to house the radio equipment but primarily (my guess here) to make for a more comfortable toilet area for the crews, and of course to house more equipment and make same easier to get to for maintenance. Jim
Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Louisville,Ky.
  • 5,077 posts
Posted by locomutt on Wednesday, November 26, 2003 1:00 PM
Okay[:)]

locomutt[:D]





)

Being Crazy,keeps you from going "INSANE" !! "The light at the end of the tunnel,has been turned off due to budget cuts" NOT AFRAID A Vet., and PROUD OF IT!!

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, November 27, 2003 11:06 PM
I believe that the high short hood housed the steam generator for passenger service
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Friday, November 28, 2003 7:54 AM
Housing the steam generator was certainly one reason for some units having a high short hood, but not so with the freight only units. Jim
Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, November 28, 2003 7:18 PM
Count the UP in as one that ran long hood forward. The LNW acquired its first geeps from the UP in the early 80s. The LNW shop at Gibsland, LA rebuilt these geeps from the frame up, and had to reverse all of the controls to run short hood forward.
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Saturday, November 29, 2003 6:40 AM
Many early GP's and SD's were equipped to run long hood forward, especially on the Eastern roads.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 2,849 posts
Posted by wabash1 on Saturday, November 29, 2003 2:36 PM
There is nothing special done to run a engine long hood out. the engine will run either direction just as easy. the only thing differant is the location of the speedometer. otherwise the controls are just as easy to get to . I prefer running long hood out.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy