Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Giant Container Ships Coming
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote user="nanaimo73"] <P>[quote user="eastside"]Are the sidings long enough? How about refueling tracks?<BR>[/quote]</P> <P>Sidings should not be an issue on the former ATSF between Los Angeles and Argentine in KC because of all of the double track. Would the only fuel stop be at Clovis for the 1000 mile inspection ?</P> <P>[/quote]</P> <P>Sidings ARE an issue, in a roundabout way, because there's a lot of the time you don't have double track because one of the tracks is withdrawn for maintenance. At a minimum you want to think about how much room you have between universal crossovers. And if you want to do overtakes, then you need outside sidings or hope that traffic is so light that you can use 10 miles of main track between crossovers as a siding for the train being overtaken without gumming up the whole main line in the process. The whole point of the triple track on UP between O'Fallons and Gibbon Junction was to be able to pull a track out of service for maintenance and still have double track.</P> <P>One fuel stop at Belen gets you between Los Angeles and Kansas City.</P> <P>S. Hadid</P> <P> </P>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy