Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Trouble in open access paradise?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<P><EM>I might add to my previous post that the former government didn't stop at separating the infrastructure from the operators, they then divided up the trackage into a significant number of sections and let bids for maintenance contracts, with the lowest bidder getting the contract. The Engineering Dept. was sold off and Railtrack had to contract back in their services. Indeed Railtrack was only allowed to retain a small number of track inspectors who were to function as auditors only. That proved to be way too few as at Hatfield a fast moving DMU derailed at a switch and slammed into the station platform. The cause was discovered to be missing bolts on an adjustment rod for the facing point lock at a switch. In other words the DMU picked the switch at nearly 90 mph. due to improper maintenance. Note that the contractor holding the contract for that section had reported excellent financial results for the previous year. The company was investigated and then fined heavily for serious failings in record keeping and employee qualifications, and all their contracts were cancelled. Since then Railtrack has been replaced by Network Rail who has taken all Maintenance and Engineering functions back in House where they belong.<BR></EM></P> <P>Yes and no. It was railtracks decision when flogged to downgrade the enginerring function and concentrate on generating cash from property. They were sold a pup when the Infrastructure/ Renewal contracts were signed and then handed to them; as basically these were based on a RPI-3% basis over 5 years on system where the number of trains was increasing. Therefore there was no incentive to actually inspect; add in a perofrmace regime which was suspect and chaos ensued. Hatfied was caused by a railbreak on a curve through RCF, nothing to do with crossings; I believe that you are mxing that up with Potters Bar. However Hatfield was the straw whoch broke the camels back as Failtrack found out to its horror that it didn't know the actual state of its asset; therefore panicked and imposed 20MPH blanket restrictions. The result was massive penalties for the users and a rerailing of a lot of sites. Not long after Railtrack was forced int administration by the government. <BR></P>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy