Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Two more articles on rail incapacity = trouble for RR's
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote]QUOTE: <i>Originally posted by rrandb</i> <br /><br />Some one has Opinions confused with Facts. It ain't ED. But there is an obvious case of a rectal cranial inversion. <br />[/quote] <br /> <br />Someone has reality confused with fantasy. It is ed whose brain don't work unless it is stimulated by fecal matter, and you who has not thought this thing through. Eddyboy has now stated that one HAS to be employed by the railroad industry in order for his or her views to be counted as being in the railroad industry POV. <br /> <br />I guess that leaves TRAINS, Railway Age, ProgressiveRailroading.com, et al out of the mix, eh?
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy