Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
July TRAINS takes on the captive shipper debate - Best Issue Ever?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Ok. This thread has degenerated into a mud slinging match...A couple of companies in the UK have put their toes into the vertical integration water, National Power did it before selling up to EWS (as a way to force prices down methinks) and British Nuclear Fuels (BNFL)are VI to an extent as well. The extent is that they did not/ Do Not own the track. BNFL does control some of its own siding infrastructure, but they have their own locomotives, wagons and crews. A lot of it is to have control of a very sensitive supply. <br /> <br />However, just two large flies in the OA ointment. Though the shippers have a choice of freight operators the track provider is basically drowning in debt and is looking to differentiate the price of track access which could see some traffic lost to rail whether Red train Co, Blue Train Co or Green Train Co operates it. They are very very price conscious and price elastic so it seems. Secondly the amount of bureaucracy involved is somewhat mind boggling. If you want a certain amount of Intramodal comp then the US will have to move to basically a scheduled railway system I would think.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy