Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
53' x 102" Domestic Container thoughts.
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
It seems to me from some quick calculations that it would reduce the overall weight of the road platform, the combined container and chassis, but not the container itself. However, the gain for the container would be on the order of a few hundred pounds. <br />Think about the current mismatch in domestic containers. The fifth wheel tunnel cuts into the floor framing above the tractor's tandem wheels, the stacking posts cut the top and bottom rails, which act as chords for the box beam which is the container body, forcing the rails to be spliced on either side of the stacking post with a lot of fasteners. There is a reason why the original 40' ISO containers had the stacking posts placed at the ends of the box. By far such an arrangement is so much more efficient.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy