Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Plans for ethanol plant on hold.
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
What was the shortline viability rule of thumb? 100 carloads per mile per year? <br /> <br />How many carloads minimum would probably ship from this plant each year, more than a few hundred? <br /> <br />If so, then UP can more than afford to pay for a few miles of upgraded spur line. Remember, this plant will be captive to UP, which means UP is getting up to 400% of revenue to variable costs. <br /> <br />Obviously, something else is going on with the railroad's management to derail this project. Something other than reasoned logic and up front honesty. <br /> <br />But as mudchicken points out, the railroads are right and everyone else is wrong!
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy