Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Steam Locomotives versus Diesels
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Old timer, I'm speculating there was a RIO drop of about half shortly after deilization, but that would be offset by the great increase after they layoffs of the 3rd man of steamers and the hundreds of support crews. <br /> <br />As I stated earlier, deisels increased ROI and profits by reducing the Manhours a railroad had to employ compared to steam. No longer did you need those turntables and roundhouses everywhere, nor the countless men who stationed refueling/watering points along the route. Specilized mechanics were replaced by the general mechanics, as most deisels had interchangeable parts and unlike steamers, didn't need to have certain parts fabricated on site. <br /> <br />After 9 pages of this, we still have Sol and company arguing with no direct evidence of anything except that manhours were reduced and profits were increased by deiselization.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy