Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Steam Locomotives versus Diesels
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
There were a lot of railroads for which the decision to dieselize was the correct one at that time. You can second-guess them all you want with the benefit of fifty years of 20-20 hindsight, but for the Southerns and the GM&Os and the PRRs and the Milwaukee Roads and all those dependent on a lot of old, obsolete steam power - even those who had a good quantity of what would be considered modern steam power - a lot of them would not have lasted ten more years - twenty at the outside - if they had to do business with steam in the 1960s and 1970s. Labor costs and inflation made the big difference. The labor cost savings alone in the 1950s can be quantified - go back and look them up. The data are available. <br /> <br />The whole point is moot and has been for decades. Lets move on. <br /> <br />Old Timer
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy