Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Noteable Steamers
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Murphy - I explained the changes from the drawing in a previous post. The drawing is exaggerated soley for the purpose of explaining the basics. You are not going to have a 2' long crankpin, rather you will have more like a pyramid or cone extending outward from the wheel, reason #1 to provide component strength, reason #2 to spread the dynamic force over more of the wheel, which should reduce rail pounding. <br /> <br />The second thing I mentioned is angling the main rod outward from the cylinder to the first wheel, and all wheels would be pyramided/coned outward by necessity. Otherwise the first side rod "tight" to the wheel would interfere with the conical wheel. <br /> <br />But as you say, a lot of engineering for what? I cannot answer the main question of whether having large diameter drivers, a large firebox, and no trailing truck to support it (e.g. more weight on drivers) is any advantage over any other steam designs.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy