Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
I'd think a pipeline of any kind should go to the nearest navigatable place on the Missouri river where it could be shipped the rest of the way east by water. Sending it to rail defeats the economics as pipelines are expensive to build but an order of magnitude more efficient to operate provided there's sufficient quantitiy. <br /> <br />I also wouldn't view it as a complete replacement for rail. Another alternative would be to burn more coal near the mines and export electricity. Higher fuel prices should compensate for increased transmission line losses. <br /> <br />If logs in petroleum wont work, how about bowling balls in a Natural gas pipeline??
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag