Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
The Great Northern Railroad
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Wellington believed that route and ruling grade were of far greater importance than curvature and accumulative grades. The Milwaukee, NP, and GN lines all had a ruling grade of 2.2%, so in that aspect they all come in even. The Milwaukee was slightly shorter than GN and much shorter than NP, so in that aspect we'll still call it even between Milwaukee and GN. Of course, it could be that Wellington was speaking of localized segments rather than a whole regional profile. <br /> <br />Just for fun, Wellington also believed that switchbacks were preferable to reverse curves for achieving elevation. Can you imagine modern trains seesawing their way up and down mountain divisions? But, what can you expect from a book published in the 1880's?
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy