Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote]QUOTE: Originally posted by Murphy Siding Zoom! Went right over my head in a hurry.I can see hoe it is put forth that "captive" shippers *might* receive lower rates due to OA. I haven't seen yet, a plausible explanation as to how OA would improve the rest of the rail system. In fact, I've read lots of plausible explanations as to why we could expect rail rates to go up. [/quote] And those "plausible" explanations for rail rates going up under OA are what? Multiple users causing higher costs? Funny, we already have situations of multiple users here in the U.S., and no one has offered any evidence that such multiple use results in higher costs on a tonnage moved basis. Come to think of it, I was the only one who offered a counterargument to my own statement that OA would result in lower rates, in that it would be harder for host railroads to engage in and get away with deferred maintenance. After all, it costs more to keep the tracks in optimal shape day in and day out.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag