Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
UP Turbine train question
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote]QUOTE: <i>Originally posted by kenneo</i> <br /><br /> <br /> <br />The SP also ordered the "hood" variety and the three ALCO C643H's. Those units (ALCO's) rode so hard that crews started filing injury claims![/quote] <br /> <br />Really? you mean like "back injuries" because of bumpy rides? or something else? <br /> <br />[quote]QUOTE: <br /> There were several reasons why they were not continued, but most can be called "unfamilure technology". Cost of parts also played a part.[/quote] <br /> <br />Think trains mag made mention of something a few years ago along the lines that the railroads were not set up like the socialist german govt where primary interest is in creating jobs for people to work, which I guess was a shot at the high maintenance labor requirement? <br /> <br />[quote]QUOTE: <br />We had several assigned to Eugene for a while and the Division used them on the Brooklyn-Eugene pool with one K-M and an F7 A unit paired back-to-back. The F7 would be able to start the train which the K-M could not do. But once the F7 had even only just 1/2 MPH the K-M could hold its feet and the train took off like a rocket. Quite a sight! <br />[/quote] <br /> <br />I'll bet...got any pix?
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy