Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Mergers, abandonments, limited capacity, and the taxpayer,...OH MY!!
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote]QUOTE: <i>Originally posted by futuremodal</i> <br /><br /> it is my belief that the user fee system applied to highway should also be applied to publicly funded/owned rail lines. The federal fuel tax should be extended to fuel puchased by railroads, and the funds from this tax should be used to add capacity where needed via public expenditure. Of course, for this to work with optimal fluidity, you need to add the access where it can get the most use from the most users, which means that a railroad's competitors should have as much right to use publicly funded rail additions as the primary railroad, otherwise we are engaged in nothing more than corporate welfare for the sake of monopolistic practitioneers. <br />[/quote] <br /> <br />Well FM, I think that you have a very good perspective on that....Gov't subsidy wouldn't upset me with a viable system of recovery in place.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy