Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Should we continue to stick to one gauge for rail transit in the US?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote]QUOTE: <i>Originally posted by Peterson6868</i> <br />[As for freight and wider gauges I got that idea from visiting my local marina on Lake Michigan were they use a "Marine Railway" to move boats around the yard. <br />They use a 8 foot gauge track. So I came up with the vision of barges being floated on huge flatcars and being tuged around by deisal engines. There would be 20 foot wide track for the barges and standerd track for the standerd gauge in the middle. <br />[/quote] <br /> <br />That's actually not a bad observation. Such a gauge could fit well with retrofitted LASH-ship concept.. <br /> <br />http://www.waterman-steamship.com/specs.htm <br /> <br />...., but rather than the 30' x 60' specs of the current LASH system, maybe something more in the line of 20' x 60'. One of the drawbacks of the current LASH system is that it is entirely predicated toward barge transport, so it is completely dependent on non-time sensitive commodities. With a rail based LASH system, you could move the more time sensitive commodities as well as standard bulk commodities.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy