Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Amtrak
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote]QUOTE: <i>Originally posted by letzerich</i> <br /><br />President Bush, in his $ 2.75 trillion budget proposal has sounded the death knell for Amtrak with the elimination of the $ 1.2 billion annual subsidy. This is long overdue as Amtrak has not been viable for the last several years, I'm not sure that the wole endeavour wasn't still born at conception. <br />[/quote] <br /> <br /> <br />Not viable to WHOM? <br /> <br />So Amtrak share of intercity travel is 1% comapred to like 85% highways and 12% air and 2% bus. <br /> <br />Teachers represent about 2% of U.S. society with farmers a little less. <br /> <br />They're insignificant? <br /> <br />Tell that to 25 million people that rode the system last year, despite Amtrak being attacked left and right. <br /> <br />Given Washington's three decades of stiffing Amtrak when it comes to funding, actually decreasing rail funding in gigantic amounts while increasing highway and air funding (those aren't subsidized, right!), it's a miracle Amtrak has the market share it has now. <br /> <br />Record ridership. More than anytime in the past three decades.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy