QUOTE: Originally posted by SP9033 QUOTE: Originally posted by gabe I wasn't altogether serious. Although, one would be naive to believe that pork doesn't play a part in Amtrak development--often to the detriment of Amtrak. I am sure Amtrak hates it as much as I do. If they know they are only getting 1.5 Billion dollars of funding in a particular year; it really has to burn to have pork force x amount of those dollars into areas that aren't as needing of capital as compared to others. I think David Gunn was hinting at this problem during his recent talk on the problems with Accela. Gabe Well Gabe, Welcome to the political land of government funding. Now, if those politicos that designed this Amtrak that absolved capitalist from their responsibilities a funding source, none of what we have watched or will watch would be necessary. Amtrak today would be happily operating, just like the post office! Jim
QUOTE: Originally posted by gabe I wasn't altogether serious. Although, one would be naive to believe that pork doesn't play a part in Amtrak development--often to the detriment of Amtrak. I am sure Amtrak hates it as much as I do. If they know they are only getting 1.5 Billion dollars of funding in a particular year; it really has to burn to have pork force x amount of those dollars into areas that aren't as needing of capital as compared to others. I think David Gunn was hinting at this problem during his recent talk on the problems with Accela. Gabe
QUOTE: Originally posted by csxengineer98 becoues we are sick of discussing it... csx engineer
QUOTE: Cool, Amtrak ran like the Post Office: So conductors would randomly snap and shoot the passengers and fellow employees, trains that normally take 20 hours to get from point A to point B would inexplicably take 4 days every four to five months, and ticket fairs would steadily go up past the rate of the inflation despite the lack of an appreciable difference in service. But, now that you mention it, maybe it would be a good thing. If Amtrak were run like the post office, FedEx, UPS, and DSL could then start a competing passenger service and run circles around it. Your right, maybe that would lead to better passenger service. Gabe P.S. To postal employees: those comments are directed at your boss, not you. And I have the upmost respect--and empathy--for those working in governemnt.
QUOTE: Originally posted by trainluver1 QUOTE: Originally posted by csxengineer98 becoues we are sick of discussing it... csx engineer Hey folks. This is one of those insulters that I was refering to recently that runs people down, runs other people's topics down and will say that he has the right to do so. Keep an eye on his postings and you'll see what I mean. As for Amtrak. I wi***hem the best, and hope Bush reconsiders. trainluver1
QUOTE: Originally posted by jashauer1 Show me one that turns a profit.
Originally posted by daveklepper [ Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR Austin TX Sub Reply csxengineer98 Member sinceOctober 2002 From: US 2,358 posts Posted by csxengineer98 on Wednesday, May 4, 2005 11:53 PM QUOTE: Originally posted by spbed Kindly remember that any Interstate highway project in the USA 80% is paid thru a gasoline tax the remaining 20% is paid by the state desiring the in improvement in their system. I would think any type of tax implemented to keep A/trak going would cause a real revolt here[:o)][:D][:p] Originally posted by daveklepper [ what do you think amtrak runs on now....TAX money..... csx engineer "I AM the higher source" Keep the wheels on steel Reply spbed Member sinceDecember 2001 From: Austin TX 4,941 posts Posted by spbed on Thursday, May 5, 2005 6:26 AM Yes that is well known but what the post said is that no way would we implement a A/trak tax like the gasoline tax. Please reread my post[:o)][8D] Originally posted by csxengineer98 Originally posted by spbed [ Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR Austin TX Sub Reply Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, May 5, 2005 6:36 AM The Trinity Rail Express is not turning a profit..... Its backed by DART and the T, DART is supported by a one cent sales tax, and the T is supported by a half cent sales tax..... plus the fares......every year...... However, I would support a one cent sales tax to fund Amtrak..... Then we would have the best HSR system in the world..... With a seven trillion dollars of gross national product, one percent of this would be $70 billion..... a year..... Reply Edit oltmannd Member sinceJanuary 2001 From: Atlanta 11,968 posts Posted by oltmannd on Thursday, May 5, 2005 7:45 AM QUOTE: Originally posted by jashauer1 Show me one that turns a profit. Lots of individual services turn a profit. The French TGV, German ICE, Japanese bullet, Amtrak Acela/Metroliner are good examples. But, these are built "on the back" of a national system of other intercity, commuter and urban rail transit. So, in the net, all national passenger systems are money losers. However, this does not justify extermination. The intecity highway and air transportation systems are equally dependent on subsidized local transportation. Local highways are most often paid for by local and state property/sales/income taxes. Countries need to do what's in their best interest and in the best interest of the world. You can make a pretty good case for a substantial oil tax - if only because it would change behavior and reduce consumption. The tax could then be used to support basic research and other initiatives that could smooth the way from an oil based economy to what's next. The US needs to be a leader in this effort, not a foot-dragger. -Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/) Reply spbed Member sinceDecember 2001 From: Austin TX 4,941 posts Posted by spbed on Thursday, May 5, 2005 7:54 AM In the USA the great majority of Americans do not ride trains due to our road system & cheap airline tix. So no matter what A/trak will never be profiable in my opinion sorry to say.[:D] Originally posted by oltmannd Originally posted by jashauer1 [ Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR Austin TX Sub Reply 12 Join our Community! Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account. Login » Register » Search the Community Newsletter Sign-Up By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy More great sites from Kalmbach Media Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy
Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR Austin TX Sub
QUOTE: Originally posted by spbed Kindly remember that any Interstate highway project in the USA 80% is paid thru a gasoline tax the remaining 20% is paid by the state desiring the in improvement in their system. I would think any type of tax implemented to keep A/trak going would cause a real revolt here[:o)][:D][:p] Originally posted by daveklepper [ what do you think amtrak runs on now....TAX money..... csx engineer "I AM the higher source" Keep the wheels on steel Reply spbed Member sinceDecember 2001 From: Austin TX 4,941 posts Posted by spbed on Thursday, May 5, 2005 6:26 AM Yes that is well known but what the post said is that no way would we implement a A/trak tax like the gasoline tax. Please reread my post[:o)][8D] Originally posted by csxengineer98 Originally posted by spbed [ Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR Austin TX Sub Reply Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, May 5, 2005 6:36 AM The Trinity Rail Express is not turning a profit..... Its backed by DART and the T, DART is supported by a one cent sales tax, and the T is supported by a half cent sales tax..... plus the fares......every year...... However, I would support a one cent sales tax to fund Amtrak..... Then we would have the best HSR system in the world..... With a seven trillion dollars of gross national product, one percent of this would be $70 billion..... a year..... Reply Edit oltmannd Member sinceJanuary 2001 From: Atlanta 11,968 posts Posted by oltmannd on Thursday, May 5, 2005 7:45 AM QUOTE: Originally posted by jashauer1 Show me one that turns a profit. Lots of individual services turn a profit. The French TGV, German ICE, Japanese bullet, Amtrak Acela/Metroliner are good examples. But, these are built "on the back" of a national system of other intercity, commuter and urban rail transit. So, in the net, all national passenger systems are money losers. However, this does not justify extermination. The intecity highway and air transportation systems are equally dependent on subsidized local transportation. Local highways are most often paid for by local and state property/sales/income taxes. Countries need to do what's in their best interest and in the best interest of the world. You can make a pretty good case for a substantial oil tax - if only because it would change behavior and reduce consumption. The tax could then be used to support basic research and other initiatives that could smooth the way from an oil based economy to what's next. The US needs to be a leader in this effort, not a foot-dragger. -Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/) Reply spbed Member sinceDecember 2001 From: Austin TX 4,941 posts Posted by spbed on Thursday, May 5, 2005 7:54 AM In the USA the great majority of Americans do not ride trains due to our road system & cheap airline tix. So no matter what A/trak will never be profiable in my opinion sorry to say.[:D] Originally posted by oltmannd Originally posted by jashauer1 [ Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR Austin TX Sub Reply 12 Join our Community! Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account. Login » Register » Search the Community Newsletter Sign-Up By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy More great sites from Kalmbach Media Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy
Originally posted by daveklepper [
Originally posted by csxengineer98 Originally posted by spbed [ Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR Austin TX Sub Reply Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, May 5, 2005 6:36 AM The Trinity Rail Express is not turning a profit..... Its backed by DART and the T, DART is supported by a one cent sales tax, and the T is supported by a half cent sales tax..... plus the fares......every year...... However, I would support a one cent sales tax to fund Amtrak..... Then we would have the best HSR system in the world..... With a seven trillion dollars of gross national product, one percent of this would be $70 billion..... a year..... Reply Edit oltmannd Member sinceJanuary 2001 From: Atlanta 11,968 posts Posted by oltmannd on Thursday, May 5, 2005 7:45 AM QUOTE: Originally posted by jashauer1 Show me one that turns a profit. Lots of individual services turn a profit. The French TGV, German ICE, Japanese bullet, Amtrak Acela/Metroliner are good examples. But, these are built "on the back" of a national system of other intercity, commuter and urban rail transit. So, in the net, all national passenger systems are money losers. However, this does not justify extermination. The intecity highway and air transportation systems are equally dependent on subsidized local transportation. Local highways are most often paid for by local and state property/sales/income taxes. Countries need to do what's in their best interest and in the best interest of the world. You can make a pretty good case for a substantial oil tax - if only because it would change behavior and reduce consumption. The tax could then be used to support basic research and other initiatives that could smooth the way from an oil based economy to what's next. The US needs to be a leader in this effort, not a foot-dragger. -Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/) Reply spbed Member sinceDecember 2001 From: Austin TX 4,941 posts Posted by spbed on Thursday, May 5, 2005 7:54 AM In the USA the great majority of Americans do not ride trains due to our road system & cheap airline tix. So no matter what A/trak will never be profiable in my opinion sorry to say.[:D] Originally posted by oltmannd Originally posted by jashauer1 [ Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR Austin TX Sub Reply 12 Join our Community! Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account. Login » Register » Search the Community Newsletter Sign-Up By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy More great sites from Kalmbach Media Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy
Originally posted by spbed [ Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR Austin TX Sub Reply Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, May 5, 2005 6:36 AM The Trinity Rail Express is not turning a profit..... Its backed by DART and the T, DART is supported by a one cent sales tax, and the T is supported by a half cent sales tax..... plus the fares......every year...... However, I would support a one cent sales tax to fund Amtrak..... Then we would have the best HSR system in the world..... With a seven trillion dollars of gross national product, one percent of this would be $70 billion..... a year..... Reply Edit oltmannd Member sinceJanuary 2001 From: Atlanta 11,968 posts Posted by oltmannd on Thursday, May 5, 2005 7:45 AM QUOTE: Originally posted by jashauer1 Show me one that turns a profit. Lots of individual services turn a profit. The French TGV, German ICE, Japanese bullet, Amtrak Acela/Metroliner are good examples. But, these are built "on the back" of a national system of other intercity, commuter and urban rail transit. So, in the net, all national passenger systems are money losers. However, this does not justify extermination. The intecity highway and air transportation systems are equally dependent on subsidized local transportation. Local highways are most often paid for by local and state property/sales/income taxes. Countries need to do what's in their best interest and in the best interest of the world. You can make a pretty good case for a substantial oil tax - if only because it would change behavior and reduce consumption. The tax could then be used to support basic research and other initiatives that could smooth the way from an oil based economy to what's next. The US needs to be a leader in this effort, not a foot-dragger. -Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/) Reply spbed Member sinceDecember 2001 From: Austin TX 4,941 posts Posted by spbed on Thursday, May 5, 2005 7:54 AM In the USA the great majority of Americans do not ride trains due to our road system & cheap airline tix. So no matter what A/trak will never be profiable in my opinion sorry to say.[:D] Originally posted by oltmannd Originally posted by jashauer1 [ Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR Austin TX Sub Reply 12 Join our Community! Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account. Login » Register » Search the Community Newsletter Sign-Up By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy More great sites from Kalmbach Media Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy
-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/)
Originally posted by oltmannd Originally posted by jashauer1 [ Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR Austin TX Sub Reply 12 Join our Community! Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account. Login » Register » Search the Community Newsletter Sign-Up By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy More great sites from Kalmbach Media Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy
Originally posted by jashauer1 [ Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR Austin TX Sub Reply 12 Join our Community! Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account. Login » Register » Search the Community Newsletter Sign-Up By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy More great sites from Kalmbach Media Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.