Trains.com

The End of Amtrak

1929 views
45 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Indianapolis, Indiana
  • 2,434 posts
Posted by gabe on Tuesday, May 3, 2005 3:45 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by SP9033

QUOTE: Originally posted by gabe

I wasn't altogether serious. Although, one would be naive to believe that pork doesn't play a part in Amtrak development--often to the detriment of Amtrak. I am sure Amtrak hates it as much as I do. If they know they are only getting 1.5 Billion dollars of funding in a particular year; it really has to burn to have pork force x amount of those dollars into areas that aren't as needing of capital as compared to others.

I think David Gunn was hinting at this problem during his recent talk on the problems with Accela.

Gabe


Well Gabe,

Welcome to the political land of government funding. Now, if those politicos that designed this Amtrak that absolved capitalist from their responsibilities a funding source, none of what we have watched or will watch would be necessary.

Amtrak today would be happily operating, just like the post office!

Jim


Cool, Amtrak ran like the Post Office:

So conductors would randomly snap and shoot the passengers and fellow employees, trains that normally take 20 hours to get from point A to point B would inexplicably take 4 days every four to five months, and ticket fairs would steadily go up past the rate of the inflation despite the lack of an appreciable difference in service.

But, now that you mention it, maybe it would be a good thing. If Amtrak were run like the post office, FedEx, UPS, and DSL could then start a competing passenger service and run circles around it. Your right, maybe that would lead to better passenger service.

Gabe

P.S. To postal employees: those comments are directed at your boss, not you. And I have the upmost respect--and empathy--for those working in governemnt.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 3, 2005 4:22 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by csxengineer98

becoues we are sick of discussing it...
csx engineer


Hey folks. This is one of those insulters that I was refering to recently that runs people down, runs other people's topics down and will say that he has the right to do so. Keep an eye on his postings and you'll see what I mean.

As for Amtrak. I wi***hem the best, and hope Bush reconsiders.

trainluver1
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
  • 7,214 posts
Posted by siberianmo on Tuesday, May 3, 2005 4:37 PM
So, here we are again ..... someone posts about Amtrak, and it begins anew.
Hey! Fine with me ..... as long as the respect for the other guy's opinion overrides the anecdotal nonsense appearing in so many of these threads.

I DON'T have all the facts - I DON'T have all the answers, nor do I pretend to. I DON'T blame one single individual for the situation Amtrak finds itself in. That is absurd, simply incorrect. For those who state these off the wall opinions, how about a little backup with facts?

I am one who does communicate with elected representatives and get responses. Not by Email, but by good old fashioned letters with stamps. Just consider how many Emails these people must get and how very few actually get any attention. It's amazing to me that even the letters get to them - but they seemingly do - or at least to the administrative staffers.

So, continue riding the trains folks, if your location is fortunate enough to have the service. Continue communicating with elected officials and insist that Amtrak remain operating until THEY can come up with a better plan - a comprehensive 21st century transportation plan that calls for modernization - not just upgrades - of our nation's vital rail system.

That's it for me ....... said it before, saying it again and practicing what I preach.

See ya! [tup] [;)]
Happy Railroading! Siberianmo
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 3, 2005 4:42 PM
QUOTE: Cool, Amtrak ran like the Post Office:

So conductors would randomly snap and shoot the passengers and fellow employees, trains that normally take 20 hours to get from point A to point B would inexplicably take 4 days every four to five months, and ticket fairs would steadily go up past the rate of the inflation despite the lack of an appreciable difference in service.

But, now that you mention it, maybe it would be a good thing. If Amtrak were run like the post office, FedEx, UPS, and DSL could then start a competing passenger service and run circles around it. Your right, maybe that would lead to better passenger service.

Gabe

P.S. To postal employees: those comments are directed at your boss, not you. And I have the upmost respect--and empathy--for those working in governemnt.


Gabe,

Can you please clean up some of the quote stuff, I'm getting tired doing my clean up as well as your clean up...[:D]

The next time UPS (Union wages), FedEx (Just livable wages) or DHL (Sub-Standard wages) shows up at your place for a pickup, give them 37 cents and see just how far that will carry your messege! Those outfits fill not carry your message for that amount anywhere, but the Post Office will carry that message anywhere in the USA. Thats a bargin.

The Post Office as we know it today was hammered out of a government department during 1971. Since that time the post office has grown to meet the demands of a "right now" generation, with good results.

First Class letter to New York from Reno, NV about 4 days, cost; 37 cents, Gabe it just doesn't get any better than that, Amtrak should run that way too, it can't - that semi-government agency has no source of funding...Has no life of its own.

Jim



  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: US
  • 2,358 posts
Posted by csxengineer98 on Tuesday, May 3, 2005 7:27 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by trainluver1

QUOTE: Originally posted by csxengineer98

becoues we are sick of discussing it...
csx engineer


Hey folks. This is one of those insulters that I was refering to recently that runs people down, runs other people's topics down and will say that he has the right to do so. Keep an eye on his postings and you'll see what I mean.

As for Amtrak. I wi***hem the best, and hope Bush reconsiders.

trainluver1
oh am i now.... give me examples? show me where i did what you said i do... becoues i show you foamers where some of your ideas just dont work in the real world? show me where i ran people down? for the record..i dont insult untill i am insulted first.... i have one thing that some of you armchair railroaders wish you had..and that is real world railroad working experance.... i see things eveyday that most of you might see once in a blue moon when your out sitting in your car railfaning... it is a differnt world being in the treches eveyday then it is to just sit long them for a few hours watching me work...and listing to a scanner for an hour or 2.....
i want you to post examples of how i am such a bad guy?....becouse i speak the truth? i showed you that something you thought was true turned out to be wrong? what? show me the error of my ways? if in fact you can?
and as far as amtrak... the topic is hashed and rehashed here evey other day...thats fine... but thier is only so many ways you can cut it up befor you cover evey angle...
csx engineer
"I AM the higher source" Keep the wheels on steel
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 3, 2005 8:41 PM
I wonder if a new passenger railroad will be made if Amtrak dies.
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,026 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, May 4, 2005 12:08 AM
Again, a reminder of the huge subsidy, probably far greater than $4billion a year, given the highway and air travelers and freight by the fact that the land they occupy does not pay any real-estate taxes. And the $14billion just for Boston's "Big Dig."
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, May 4, 2005 12:23 AM
If other passenger rail can be efficent and solvent why can't Amtrak?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, May 4, 2005 12:30 AM
Show me one that turns a profit.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, May 4, 2005 12:54 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by jashauer1

Show me one that turns a profit.


Trinity Rail Express
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Wednesday, May 4, 2005 8:01 AM
Kindly remember that any Interstate highway project in the USA 80% is paid thru a gasoline tax the remaining 20% is paid by the state desiring the in improvement in their system.

I would think any type of tax implemented to keep A/trak going would cause a real revolt here[:o)][:D][:p]


Originally posted by daveklepper
[

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: US
  • 2,358 posts
Posted by csxengineer98 on Wednesday, May 4, 2005 11:53 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by spbed

Kindly remember that any Interstate highway project in the USA 80% is paid thru a gasoline tax the remaining 20% is paid by the state desiring the in improvement in their system.

I would think any type of tax implemented to keep A/trak going would cause a real revolt here[:o)][:D][:p]


Originally posted by daveklepper
[
what do you think amtrak runs on now....TAX money.....
csx engineer
"I AM the higher source" Keep the wheels on steel
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Thursday, May 5, 2005 6:26 AM
Yes that is well known but what the post said is that no way would we implement a A/trak tax like the gasoline tax. Please reread my post[:o)][8D]

Originally posted by csxengineer98

Originally posted by spbed
[

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, May 5, 2005 6:36 AM
The Trinity Rail Express is not turning a profit..... Its backed by DART and the T, DART is supported by a one cent sales tax, and the T is supported by a half cent sales tax..... plus the fares......every year......

However, I would support a one cent sales tax to fund Amtrak..... Then we would have the best HSR system in the world..... With a seven trillion dollars of gross national product, one percent of this would be $70 billion..... a year.....

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,968 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Thursday, May 5, 2005 7:45 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by jashauer1

Show me one that turns a profit.


Lots of individual services turn a profit. The French TGV, German ICE, Japanese bullet, Amtrak Acela/Metroliner are good examples.

But, these are built "on the back" of a national system of other intercity, commuter and urban rail transit. So, in the net, all national passenger systems are money losers.

However, this does not justify extermination. The intecity highway and air transportation systems are equally dependent on subsidized local transportation. Local highways are most often paid for by local and state property/sales/income taxes.

Countries need to do what's in their best interest and in the best interest of the world.

You can make a pretty good case for a substantial oil tax - if only because it would change behavior and reduce consumption.

The tax could then be used to support basic research and other initiatives that could smooth the way from an oil based economy to what's next.

The US needs to be a leader in this effort, not a foot-dragger.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Thursday, May 5, 2005 7:54 AM
In the USA the great majority of Americans do not ride trains due to our road system & cheap airline tix. So no matter what A/trak will never be profiable in my opinion sorry to say.[:D]

Originally posted by oltmannd

Originally posted by jashauer1
[

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy