Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
diesel vs steam
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
But, surely you are all missing the point. The fact is that no railway (railroad) company put R&D into steam. The fact is that is pressures and superheat had been increased efficiency would have increased. In the UK steam ran non stop London to Edinburgh picking up water from troughs was very normal. In 1903 Paddington to Plymouth 'City of Bath' pulled the Royal train (130Tons) 246 miles (top speed 87.4 MPH) over severe gradients of 1 in 43 in 233 minutes. Coal consumption got down to 2.0 lbs per HP per Hour. In the 1930's speeds rose with streamlining. But, returning to the original point when Fury blew up in Derby station killing 2 people the high-pressure trails ended. Given the money and time, who says that a new breed of steam engine could not beat diesel?
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy