Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
LETS DEBATE OPEN ACCESS
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Someone mentioned on another thread the idea of having the Corps of Engineers be in charge of constructing new rail links to supplement the current rail grid. Since the likelyhood of an expansion of the nation's waterways is highly unlikely, it would be logical for the Corps to supplement their waterways with an expansion into the rail spectrum. <br /> <br />One such logical rail link project would be a rail link from Lewiston ID to Missoula MT, connecting the easternmost point of the Columbia/Snake River waterway with direct eastern rail access. Since Corps transportation projects are all open access, they would have to incorporate this attitude into any new rail projects. The Lewiston-Missoula rail link would have UP and BNSF on the western end (via Watco's GNR), and MRL (along with trackage rights MRL has given BNSF) on the eastern end. The question then is if UP can (or would want to) access this rail link from Butte via the former Montana Western (now owned by BNSF), but other than that the open access caveat should be easily adhered to for this project. <br /> <br />It would represent the perfect trial concept for open access.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy