Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Implications of Republican sweep, part II
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Here's a quote from your own link FM... <br /><< <br />Mr. CLEMENT. Or less. Mr. Chairman, the coastwise laws of the United States go back almost 200 years. This U.S. restriction is not unique. Virtually every nation restricts its domestic transportation system to its own citizens. <br /> <br /> Today's hearing is really about jobs—jobs for U.S. citizens employed in our domestic shipping industry, jobs for U.S. citizens employed by our Nation's shipyards, and jobs for U.S. citizens employed in our domestic trucking and rail industries who should not have to compete for those jobs. <br /> <br /> Our immigration laws do not allow foreigners to take land-based jobs from U.S. citizens and taxpayers. This should not be allowed in our domestic water transportation system and industries, either. <br /> <br /> Yes, it may be possible to maybe decrease the cost of transportation to other industries, but if we follow that slippery slope, shouldn't we also allow our manufacturers in the United States to employ low-cost wage-earners from Third World countries? Shouldn't we eliminate all of our minimum wage and health and safety laws? <br /> <br /> The United States has been a world leader in improving work place standards. Through international agreements, we're trying to bring the rest of the world up to a level of safety and health. Those who would have us repeal the Jones Act would have us go in the opposite direction. Instead of bringing everyone up to the highest level of safety, they would have us all sink to the lowest common denominator—lowest wages, lowest benefits, and lowest safety standards. <br /> <br /> The attacks over the past 18 months on the Jones Act have done nothing but make investors nervous. Oil companies are hesitant to sign 5-year charters for tankers. Bankers are hesitant to issue mortgage on tankers without these long-term charters unless the Government guarantees the mortgage. <br />>> <br />Sounds strikingly familiar to my and Mark's earlier links. Seems as though there are strong arguments that have kept the Jones Act in place. I don't see any new justification for eliminating it... <br /> <br />LC
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy