Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
Andrew, <br /> <br />You need to be more concise in your arguments. We're not talking about ozone. We're not saying that pollution should not be reduced. All we are saying is look at the facts regarding man's true contribution to the greenhouse effect, and then make sure you keep the greenhouse effect in it's proper place in relation to solar and orbital variations. Since man's contribution of CO2 only amounts to 0.17% of the total greenhouse effect, it should be quite evident to all concerned that not only is that 0.17% insignificant to the entire greenhouse gas effect, it is even insignificant in relation to the extreme climate variance that has occured for eons. Since Kyoto only calls for a 7% reduction in man made CO2, it will have absolutely no effect whatsoever on the total greenhouse effect, therefore it is legislation that should have been rejected. The greenhouse effect itself is a distant third to solar and orbital variations in it's effects on climate variations. <br /> <br />Those of you who still cling to the global warming theories need to open your minds and take into account all the relevent variables regarding global climate change.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag