Trains.com

Today's TRAINS News Wire & our weekly e-mail newsletter

886 views
12 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,431 posts
Today's TRAINS News Wire & our weekly e-mail newsletter
Posted by Bergie on Monday, March 14, 2005 4:01 PM
The good news: Today's TRAINS News Wire is now live with photos from the UP/BNSF collision in Rochelle from Friday night. Click here to read today's News Wire.

The bad news: Our weekly e-mail newsletter that typically goes out on Monday evenings is going to be delayed until Tuesday afternoon as we upgrade some of our servers.

Thanks,
Erik
Erik Bergstrom
  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: US
  • 2,358 posts
Posted by csxengineer98 on Monday, March 14, 2005 4:08 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Bergie

The good news: Today's TRAINS News Wire is now live with photos from the UP/BNSF collision in Rochelle from Friday night. Click here to read today's News Wire.

The bad news: Our weekly e-mail newsletter that typically goes out on Monday evenings is going to be delayed until Tuesday afternoon as we upgrade some of our servers.

Thanks,
Erik
nice... is thier any place where you can get the video feed as it happend... not the still frames?
csx engineer
"I AM the higher source" Keep the wheels on steel
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Monday, March 14, 2005 5:14 PM
Just wondering...
Did the NTSB, BNSF and or UP ask for copies of the tape or feed?

Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 4,115 posts
Posted by tatans on Monday, March 14, 2005 5:50 PM
Also noted was the announcement about the C.P.R. buying a few green goats on the way to purchasing more in the future.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, March 14, 2005 6:13 PM
Interesting.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, March 14, 2005 6:42 PM
How does something like this happen? I would think some special flag is set when a MOW machine is on the tracks???????
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, March 14, 2005 6:54 PM
....Video Cam sure shows the merchandise strewed over the ground where the container was ripped open....Too bad we don't have a way to play the scene back. Even enough lights on scene to allow us to see rather well.....
Surely the engine crew had to ignore at least 2 warning lights to get that close to an opposing train on the tracks...! Are those lights the last line of defense when the engineer "runs" the signals......

Quentin

  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: US
  • 2,358 posts
Posted by csxengineer98 on Monday, March 14, 2005 8:19 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by talbanese

How does something like this happen? I would think some special flag is set when a MOW machine is on the tracks???????
someone ran a red light is how it happend...to put it in very simple terms...and from what i read so far...it was the railgrinder that ran the stop signal..and smashed into the side of the train at the dimond... when MOW equpment is moving on rails..its just like a train..and is governed by the same signals as a train.... the only time thier would be a flag is if MOW mechenery is tied down on a sideing or stub track...then it is protected with a derail that has a "flag" saying derail.....and if mechanical persons are working on the equpment...it is then protected with a derail and blue flag....but when its moving on main tracks...it has to follow signal indications and dispatchers orders...just like a train..
csx engineer
"I AM the higher source" Keep the wheels on steel
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Louisville,Ky.
  • 5,077 posts
Posted by locomutt on Monday, March 14, 2005 8:38 PM
Bergie,
Thanks for posting that,as CW & I both had tried several times earlier to pull
up the "Trains News Wire" for that particular article,with no luck.

Being Crazy,keeps you from going "INSANE" !! "The light at the end of the tunnel,has been turned off due to budget cuts" NOT AFRAID A Vet., and PROUD OF IT!!

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Tuesday, March 15, 2005 6:40 AM
My thanks as well. Does anyone know if the signals were operating properly on the UPRR or was the rail grinder engineer just not thinking? [:o)]

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Tuesday, March 15, 2005 6:56 PM
If the signals were not operating,the rail grinder should have considered the signal to be at its most restrictive aspect,which is usually red.Also,at the slow speed rail grinders operate,it seems to me that the operator should have been able to see,or hear,the freight in time to avoid a collision.
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,431 posts
Posted by Bergie on Tuesday, March 15, 2005 8:06 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by edblysard

Just wondering...
Did the NTSB, BNSF and or UP ask for copies of the tape or feed?

Ed


Hi Ed,

Not for official purposes... yet.

Erik
Erik Bergstrom
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Tuesday, March 15, 2005 8:27 PM
Accidents happen everyday and many it is easy to see why but with this it seems very strange a slow moving rig {if it was really working}, would not be able to prevent the hit....Almost seems like no one in control.

Quentin

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy