Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Ohio Election is close,Does that mean that Democrats need to put in more money in infrastructure to
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote]QUOTE: <i>Originally posted by ohlemeier</i> <br /><br /> <br />I heard on radio the other night, here in Kansas City area, the Colorado governor on a Denver callin show ripping that rail expansion plan. <br /> <br />"It will cost too much. No one wants to ride on a 40-mph diesel tran, etc." <br /> <br />[/quote] <br /> <br />I didn't hear that interview, but that kind of surprises me. From everything that I heard most of the Denver politicians were in favor of it. I know that the mayor was one of the major backers for it. And I didn't think that it was going to be a diesel train, everything that is existing in the light rail system right now is electric. I guess that it is possible that the Boulder-Denver leg might be diesel, but I know that I would still ride it! <br /> <br />What really needs to be approved is a passenger rail system all along the Front Range here. A train that would go from say Pueblo to Fort Collins would really help all of the traffic that is always on I-25. I think that would just be too much infrastructure to be realistic unfortunately.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy