Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote user="tree68"]I don't think so. I thing most everyone here agrees that the railroad was keeping an eye on things and determined that normal operation was appropriate. [/quote] In your response to my post you said BNSF was perhaps surprised? How can it be both at the same time. [quote user="tree68"]The water in the fields may have been there for several days without causing undue alarm. There was ongoing high water in the area.[/quote] We learned in Germany that not the water height destroys a river levee (as long as it is below the rim) but the exposure duration. I'm not in possession of the information to challenge the railroads judgement but I have doubts. I hope that public interest is large enough (oil spill, drinking water) that BNSF is forced to publish their investigation results. Regards, Volker Edit: Interesting to see that the software blocks a technical term because it has colloquially an additional meaning. Are users deemed too dumb here to understand the meaning from the context?
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag