Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
Perhaps trucking engines (>2,000 rpm) and railroad engines (<1,000 rpm) are not comparable? Caterpillal/EMD provided a broschure for the 710 engine that shows that the fuel consumption was reduces by 20% from 567C to 710G3C-T3. Within the 710 engine alone is were 8%: [url]s7d2.scene7.com/is/content/Caterpillar/CM20170915-60253-59723[/url] Regards, Volker Edit: Sorry I can't make the link clickable
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag