Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
railroad viaducts
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Why do some writers in this thread object to designing the highway correctly in the first place. Face it! People goof from time to time; and that sometimes results in accidents, injuries and death. <br /> <br />But if the highway was designed right in the first place, the opportunity to screw up wouldn't even exist where avoidable hazards have been removed. There wouldn't be any arguing over fault if the accident couldn't happen in the first place. And don't forget that there are a lot more highway hazards than just at railroad crossings. All are a threat to public safety. <br /> <br />And yes, our politicians do over-ride proper engineering by allowing too high, too wide, too long, too heavy - TOO BIG trucks on the road, without first beefing up the highways. Now if it costs too much to beef up the roads to a higher standard, then DON'T BEEF UP THE TRUCKS! <br /> <br />If we are not going to hold highway designers and politicians accountable, why is the professional railway designer still held accountable. If he leaves an un-mitigated hazard, his P.E. license is in jeopardy. His licence can be challenged anytime someone gets hurt because of his negligence, and in egregious cases, time in jail results. To protect themselves, railway designers, like all scientists, always submit to peer review, hoping to catch hazards before they hurt anyone. <br /> <br />So why not the highway designer as well! As usual, there is a double standard. Railroad people get screwed while the highway designers go scott free. <br /> <br />Even if us railroaders like to look down on truckers, they make no more mistakes than we do, but their mistakes are far more likely to result in an accident. Most of our human errors are protected against by a thick layer of procedure, failsafe equipment, and a very safety conscious work culure. Yes there is room for improvement, but while we take all this for granted most of the time, the trucker has no such protection at all. <br /> <br />The relative accident rates and causal studies between trucks and railroads clearly support the assertion that any trucker error is far more likely to result in accident. <br /> <br />I still say, put the lion's share of blame squarely where the hazard started, with the highway designers and politicians, and not on the little guy that haplessly falls into their traps - as long as he stays on scene and was not willfully negligent that is. <br /> <br />RmC <br />
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy