Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Rusting equipment
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="tree68"]</p> <p> </p> <div class="quote-header"> </div> <blockquote class="quote"> <div class="quote-user">VOLKER LANDWEHR</div> <div class="quote-content">As someone said before many of the old bridges were overdesigned, if for rusting or looking forward to future higher loads or just so I can't say. But the effect is the same.</div> </blockquote> <div class="quote-footer"> </div> <p> </p> <p><span style="color:#003300;font-family:'comic sans ms', sans-serif;">I've always thought of the overengineered thing as a result of the lack of sophistication of their design computations. Rather than design specifically to use, as occurs today using computer modelling, they threw in a significant margin of safety.</span></p> <div style="clear:both;"> </div> <p>[/quote]</p> <p>The structural analysis of trusses is not sophisticated. The Cremona diagram or the method of sections are known since the 1860s and are exact for statically determined trusses.</p> <p>That doesn't say that you are not right. I think we don't know the reasons. Therefore I added "or just so".<br />Regards, Volker </p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy