Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Goodbye to ballast?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>Norm,</p> <p>the discussion will go on until the last country switches to SI-unit. Having had a decimal system before the switch was quite easy for us.</p> <p>I started as an civil engineer in the pre-SI-unit era. I'm in model railroading following American prototypes since the early 1980s. So I'm quite used to imperial measures.</p> <p>For industry and trade one single system might be better. But I think humans would find measures to erect new hindrances.</p> <p>I get along with both systems, for sure better with the decimal system.</p> <p>Perhaps I didn't understand RME's post correctly. So I posted some details about the meter definition and its history.</p> <p>I don't understand RME's statement "The fact that the 'time' involved does not fit into the groups-of-three SI framework applied to time in seconds". Therefore the list of basic SI-units.</p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy