Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Goodbye to ballast?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
<p>[quote user="Paul_D_North_Jr"]Volker Landwehr said (above): "To avoid misalignment at joints dowels or tongue and groove constructions can be used." [/quote]</p> <p>This comment was directed ar the concrete highway problems.</p> <p>[quote user="Paul_D_North_Jr"]Those methods address only the deflection/ displacement (i.e., in the Y and Z directions) at the joint, and not the slopes or angles approaching and leaving the joint.[/quote]</p> <p>As already said, Boegl addresses this topic. Thr rail seats are about 13'' from the joint. The rail will compensate for some of this angles.</p> <p>[quote user="Paul_D_North_Jr"]I'd still like to know what the average and maximum 'normal' axle loads are used for the design and actual operation of such slab-track systems, as well as the speeds. [/quote]</p> <p>For Europe the axle load is 25 tons. The ICE trains have axle loads of 20 tons and speeds of up to 200 mph. The Chinese high speed trains have axle loads of 19 tons and speeds up to 220 mph.</p> <p>If I read the diagram on page 4 correctly, axle loads of 42 tons at 68 mph are possible.<br />Regards, Volker</p>
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy