Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Roadrailers vs. Piggybacks
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote]QUOTE: <i>Originally posted by M.W. Hemphill</i> <br /><br />BNSF is now accepting ordinary trailers in straddle-lift piggyback service -- it used to be that only special reinforced trailers (Z trailers) could stand the abuse of a straddle-lift. This is one of the more significant technological breakthroughs in recent years, and it's hardly been reported. I didn't even know about it until this spring. I don't know if the technology is available to other railroads or if this is a BNSF-only.[/quote] <br /> <br />Regarding this potential bombshell of innovation, is BNSF accepting any trailer, e.g. tankers, flatbeds, as well as dry vans? If so, they have just tapped a huge market. My understanding is that over 70% of the trailers out there are not the reinforced Z trailers, and the prevailing thought was that such trailers could only piggyback using roll-on/roll-off platforms, which would require more capital investment for an untested marketing concept. In fact, didn't railcar maker Trinity just come out with a new 7 platform articulated ro-ro car? If BNSF has found a cheaper way to carry non-reinforced trailers on standard TOFC cars, then they have scored a big one! <br /> <br />Dave
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy