Found some more info:
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/11/21/2018-25388/csx-transportation-inc-lease-western-and-atlantic-railroad
Financial Arrangements. According to CSXT, no new securities will be issued in connection with the Lease. (Appl. 8.) CSXT states that, under the Lease, CSXT would pay Georgia a monthly rental of $1,008,333.33, which would increase annually by 2.5% compounded. Additionally, CSXT states that, by July 31 of each year, it would pay Georgia additional rent consisting of 50% of the revenue generated from all agreements, subleases, easements, or licenses attributable to the Line for the previous year. CSXT states that it will not incur any fixed charges as a result of the Lease. (Id. at 10.)
Greyhounds: You simply state your opinions as though they were facts, without evidence.
greyhounds, with the railroad having a centralizing nature, do you see a future for it? It seems that the forces of decentralization have the upper hand.
charlie hebdo I'm not sure the railroads pay much in federal taxes ...........
charlie hebdo I proposed payment, not just compensation. Then we might get better ROWs and electrification where traffic is sufficient. The railroads would have a ton of money to use on new equipment. Any agreement would require that, not declare huge dividends to stockholders. Time to move into the 1980s at least, if not into the future.
I proposed payment, not just compensation. Then we might get better ROWs and electrification where traffic is sufficient. The railroads would have a ton of money to use on new equipment. Any agreement would require that, not declare huge dividends to stockholders. Time to move into the 1980s at least, if not into the future.
Where do you plan to put this electrification where traffic is sufficient? Are the expenses of clearance modification and removal worth the cost? You need at minimum 3' of clearance between 20'2" height and overhead line to prevent arcing.. Electrification is one of the reasons the Milwaukee Road had to abandon it's entire Pacific Extension, and eventually succumb to bankruptcy.. This isn't Europe.
charlie hebdoI proposed payment, not just compensation. Then we might get better ROWs and electrification where traffic is sufficient. The railroads would have a ton of money to use on new equipment. Any agreement would require that, not declare huge dividends to stockholders. Time to move into the 1980s at least, if not into the future.
Railroads have been reducing their car fleets over the last two decades. When watching passing trains look at all the car initials ending in X. Cars that once had railroad reporting marks.
The PSR model is about getting as much investment out of the railroads and into the hands of the stock holders as possible - by whatever feats of financial legerdemain they can create. As tightly as any 'thinks' they can tie up the money and keep it 'in the property' the PSR crowd perform legal dances on the pointed end of a pin and liberate it for their purposes.
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
Looks like we're back at Square One regarding KCS as they formally rejected the latest Blackstone Group offer.
Los Angeles Rams GuyLooks like we're back at Square One regarding KCS as they formally rejected the latest Blackstone Group offer.
Good for KCS!
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.