Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Traffic crashes 2003 - Isn't there a better/safer way?
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Why does our planning process force people to drive? Ever since we started building freeways professional planners have never questioned the constitutionality of allowing new development that's accessible and functional for motorists only. We should prohibit any new urban/suburban development that's not at least as accessible and functional for non-drivers as it is for those who drive. No one should be forced to depend on a mode of transportation so dangerous that it requires seat belts, air bags or crash helmets, but there are no mandates for a safer alternatives. Period! Paragraph! Furthermore . . .
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy