Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote]QUOTE: Originally posted by dharmon I say, let them do it. In fact ban the use of horns all together. And then place a sign at crossings that says proceed at on risk, RR takes no responsibilty for injury / death. Or even better, just remove the horns and crossing gates altogether and use the money to put big plows on the locos. A person will look both ways before crossing a street, now they'll have to do it crossing the RR tracks.....Plus it will help thin out the gene pool of stupid people. Here is CA, alot of complaining going on.....Folks want trains to relieve traffic congestion, but want someone else to pay for it. They want the RRs to do something about teenagers that lie down on the RR tracks and get run over, but want a horn ban in the city. They want something done about RR vs auto collisions (notice I don't call them accidents), but complain when the streets get closed to build a freakin' overpass instead of a grade crossing..... take the horns off......remove the gates......the strong will survive and the weak (of mind and attention span) will return to food chain at the beginning of the cycle...[:(!] [/quote] why have large plows when you can get death spikes[}:)][}:)][}:)][}:)][}:)]
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag