Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Classification Confusion
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
This is from memory, so I'm not 100% sure... <br />The first DD35 were booster units (I believe that EMD built a demonstrator set with two DD35 between two GP35, for a total of 15,000 horsepower, which is what Union Pacific's operating people thought they wanted). A year or two later, U.P. asked for some with operating cabs: they were called, to distingui***hem from the earlier B-units, DDA35. <br />When EMD introduced its "40" series of 645-engined models in 1966, the catalogued a DDA35 lookalike called either-- I don't remember which-- DD40 or DDA40. No sales. After a few more years, Union Pacific ordered a modified-- bit larger, wide nose, various technology updates that eventually went into the 1972 "Dash 2" line, engine rated at 10% more power-- version, which I'm pretty sure was called the DDA40X: DDA for a cab-equipped DD, 40 for its 16-645 engines, X for the new features ad semi-experimental status. They were delivered in 1969, the hundredth anniversary of the completion of the transcontinental railroad, so U.P.'s p.r. people dubbed them the "Centennial" class.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy