Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Future of Railroading
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote]QUOTE: <i>Originally posted by jeaton</i> <br /><br />Right now, I would like to be an infrastructure owner, especially a transcon line. Given that these lines may be near capacity, I would be selling slots for trains to the highest bidders. Talk about an oppurtunity to make big bucks... <br />[/quote] <br /> <br />The major problem with this idea is that railroads don't earn their cost of capital, meaning that rail rates are not high enough to maintain all the infrastructure as it should be maintained and still earn a profit. Accordingly, there certainly isn't enough revenue for both an infrastructure and an operating compan to realize a profit without cutting corners somewhere. This gets you into the situation that resulted in Great Britain where RailTrack the infrastructure company went bankrupt and rail service went way downhill requiring a government bailout after the split between the infrastructure and operating companies. <br /> <br />It just doesn't add up unless you can substantially increase rates. Given that the customers who are behind open access in the first place want LOWER rates, not higher rates the open access idea is doomed to failure one way or the other... <br /> <br />LC
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy