Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Triple Crown, CSX dysfunction, and NS lethargy
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
[quote]QUOTE: <i>Originally posted by rrnut282</i> <br /><br /> There will still be only one switch in the ex-Wabash EB main. <br />[/quote] <br /> <br />Now I'm cofused again,..what made perfect sense 5 minutes ago, now seems uncertain. <br /> <br />They are putting in the second track far enough to reach the Piqua wye aren't they? <br /> <br />Such that if need be they could bring a west bound coming in to town from NE into TC via the WYE while sending a west bound out of TC via the current track? <br /> <br />Maybe I'm totally lost, but in thinking about what you said earlier about the decision to not double the TC line all the way to Mike, I started pondering the use of the Piqua wye as the SECOND SWITCH to the main, and it made sense with the importance being to route trains needing access to TC onto the southside line of the pair (at either NE or Hugo) and using the main laying on the north side of the pair for runaround either east bound or westbound. LOL,..am I "lost" again?
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy