Trains.com

" ??? Locked

1424 views
4 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: Roanoke, VA
  • 2,015 posts
" ???
Posted by BigJim on Thursday, April 27, 2017 9:33 AM

Okay, I'll bite.

This ["] shows up from time to time, as in (Remembering the "Professional Iconoclast"). What does it mean?

.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,924 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, April 27, 2017 10:09 AM

BigJim
Okay, I'll bite.

This ["] shows up from time to time, as in (Remembering the "Professional Iconoclast"). What does it mean?

What it means is the software the presents Thread Titles can't properly process special characters.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

RME
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • 2,073 posts
Posted by RME on Thursday, April 27, 2017 10:15 AM

BigJim
Okay, I'll bite.  This ["] shows up from time to time, as in (Remembering the "Professional Iconoclast"). What does it mean?

It means that people who took money to code a Web site didn't earn all of it.

What you see is code that, in one version of 'markup language', puts a quotation mark in text (so that, for example, when "smart quotes" which curl one way at the beginning and the other way at the end are wanted instead of the regular 'straight' quote characters, they will display correctly. 

When the page code is rendered by a browser, the markup code is supposed to produce the intended effect.  When that doesn't happen, the browser faithfully displays the code characters as text.  This sort of crap happens fairly often in the Bangalore-revised version of Yahoo Groups; the design team would plow ahead and "fix" one thing in the formatting, which would then break something else, and they finally gave up and decremented the whole thing.

One 'correct' way to do this is to perform multiple passes on a post or e-mail text, to determine if the signature of improperly-rendered code characters remains in the text, and revise them separately (perhaps according to a rule-based or contextually-aware engine) if found.  But this is evidently too difficult a concept, or too old-fashioned an IxD precept, for the Arotz Maimons of this world.  So until the revolution we just have to put up with it. 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 24,857 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, April 27, 2017 11:55 AM

You'll see the same type of thing if a command-line commando like me uses the wrong bracket, ie [quote]words[/quote}.  If I used the right brackets, it would look thus:

words

But it is a deficiency in the software the forum uses.  Probably the most common thing we see is the mis-coded ampersand.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Thursday, April 27, 2017 12:02 PM

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy